Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
C.S.DIAS, J
1 AKHIL, AGED 37 YEARS S/O NATARAJAN – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF KERALA – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. accused charged under various ipc sections. (Para 1) |
| 2. petitioners claim settlement of disputes. (Para 2) |
| 3. both parties desire to quash proceedings. (Para 4 , 5) |
| 4. court affirms quashing ability for settled disputes. (Para 6) |
| 5. case deemed fit for quashingd due to settlement. (Para 7) |
O R D E R
The petitioners are accused Nos.1 to 4 in C.C.No.1195 of 2020 on the file of the Court of the Judicial Magistrate of First Class-I, Adoor ('Trial Court', in short), which originates from Crime No.3622 of 2017 registered by the Adoor Police Station, Pathanamthitta, alleging the commission of the offences punishable under Sections 143, 147, 148, 294(b), 323, 324, 326 and 427 read with Section
149 of the Indian Penal Code.
2. The petitioners have invoked the inherent jurisdiction of this Court under Section 528 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita , 2023, to quash all further proceedings in the above case. It is asserted that the dispute that led to the registration of the crime has been amicably settled between the petitioners and the respondents 2 and 3, who have executed Annexures A3 and affidavit dated 11.11.2025, affirming the settlement. 3. I have heard the learned
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
