Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation

2025 Supreme(Online)(Ker) 54996

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
C.S. DIAS, J
ANCYMOL C.A – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF KERALA – Respondent
CRL.MC NO. 10568 OF 2025 | CRIME NO.1290/2025

Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: SHRI.T.T.RAKESH, SMT. T.H.RAIHANATH, SHRI.HAMEEDU KUNJU.A
For the Respondents: SR.PP.SRI.C.S.HRITHWIK

The court upheld the petitioner's request to dismiss the case as not pressed, reaffirming procedural compliance.

Headnote:Under the provisions outlined in the relevant statutes, the petitioner submitted a motion to dismiss the Crl.M.C. The petitioner contended that the matter was not required to be pursued further, leading to the court's evaluation. The court found merit in the petitioner's claim and decided not to press the case forward. The court ruled that the Crl.M.C is dismissed as not pressed.

ORDER

Dated this the 08^th day of December, 2025 The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that the Crl.M.C may be dismissed as not pressed.

Recording the above submission, the Crl.M.C is dismissed as not pressed.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

2025 Supreme(Online)(Ker) 54996

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAMC.S. DIAS, JANCYMOL C.A – AppellantVersusSTATE OF KERALA – RespondentCRL.MC NO. 10568 OF 2025 | CRIME NO.1290/2025

The court upheld the petitioner's request to dismiss the case as not pressed, reaffirming procedural compliance.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
C.S. DIAS, J
ANCYMOL C.A – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF KERALA – Respondent
CRL.MC NO. 10568 OF 2025 | CRIME NO.1290/2025