Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
MOHAMMED NIAS C.P., J
PRAVEEN K PAULOSE – Appellant
Versus
THE SECRETARY REGIONAL TRANSPORT AUTHORITY – Respondent
WP(C) NO. 6604 OF 2025
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. challenge to timings revision. (Para 1) |
| 2. direction to consider objections. (Para 2) |
J U D G M E N T
The petitioner challenges Ext.P3 request made by the 2nd respondent herein for revision of the timings of his stage carriage. It is stated that the timing conference for considering the same scheduled as per Ext.P6 on 21.02.2025, was stayed by this Court, and the interim order is still in force.
2. Taking note of the fact that the petitioner is objecting to the revision of timings of the stage carriage of the 2nd respondent, there will be a direction to the 1st respondent to consider the objections of the petitioner as well, while considering the request for revision of timings preferred by the 2nd respondent herein. The 1st respondent will advert to the rival contentions and pass a speaking order adverting to the same, within two months from the date of receipt of a copy of this judgment. All the contentions of the parties are left open.
The writ petition is disposed of as above.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
