SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(Ker) 55004

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
MOHAMMED NIAS C.P., J
VASANTHI – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF KERALA – Respondent
WP(C) NO. 8484 OF 2022



Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: SRI.DINESH MATHEW, J. MURICKEN, SRI.VINOD S. PILLAI, SHRI.MOHAMMED THAYIB N.M., SMT.NAYANA VARGHESE, SHRI.AHAMMAD SACHIN K.
For the Respondents: SRI. SREEJITH V.S., SENIOR GOVERNMENT PLEADER

The court dismissed the writ petition as infructuous based on the party's submission of the irrelevance of present claims.

Headnote:The petitioner sought relief through WP

(C) NO. 8484 OF 2022 but the court found the prayers made in the writ petition to be infructuous. The court noted the submission by the petitioner's counsel and subsequently dismissed the writ petition. The primary question considered was the appropriateness of the petition in light of the claim's status, leading to the conclusion that the matter was not suitable for adjudication. Consequently, the order was to dismiss the petition as infructuous.

JUDGMENT

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the prayers sought for in this writ petition have become infructuous. This is recorded.

Accordingly, the Writ petition is dismissed as infructuous.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top