SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(Ker) 55008

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
MOHAMMED NIAS C.P., J
SASI.A.T. – Appellant
Versus
THE SECRETARY, REGIONAL TRANSPORT AUTHORITY – Respondent


Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: SRI.O.D.SIVADAS, SMT.VINAYA V.NAIR
For the Respondents: SHRI.K.V.GOPINATHAN NAIR, SMT. SURYA BINOY, SR. GP.

J U D G M E N T

The petitioner challenges Ext.P7 notice, which scheduled the timing conference for considering the revision of the timings of the stage carriage of the 2nd respondent herein. The petitioner objects to the same.

2. Taking note of the fact that the 1st respondent has already scheduled a timing conference, the writ petition is disposed of, directing that the objections of the petitioner and the 3rd respondent also be considered while considering the request for revision of timings of the stage carriage of the 2nd respondent.

3. The 1st respondent will advert to the rival contentions and pass a speaking order, within two months from the date of receipt of a copy of this judgment. All the contentions of the parties are left open.

The writ petition is disposed of as above.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top