Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation

2025 Supreme(Online)(Ker) 55010

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
MOHAMMED NIAS C.P., J
PRANAV NADUVILEPARAMBIL THANKAPPAN – Appellant
Versus
REGIONAL PASSPORT OFFICER – Respondent
WP(C) NO. 44149 OF 2025

Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: SHRI.MOHAMMED ASHRAF, SHRI.AKHIL VIJ
For the Respondents: SMT. O.M. SHALINA, DSGI

The court upheld the procedural integrity allowing the withdrawal of the writ petition as per the request of the petitioner.

Headnote:The petition was filed under WP

(C) No. 44149 of 2025. The petitioner sought permission to withdraw the writ petition, citing reasons for the withdrawal. The Court granted the permission, leading to the dismissal of the petition as withdrawn. The decision reflects the Judiciary's adherence to procedural submissions made by counsel.

JUDGMENT

The learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission to withdraw the writ petition. Permission granted. Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

2025 Supreme(Online)(Ker) 55010

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAMMOHAMMED NIAS C.P., JPRANAV NADUVILEPARAMBIL THANKAPPAN – AppellantVersusREGIONAL PASSPORT OFFICER – RespondentWP(C) NO. 44149 OF 2025

The court upheld the procedural integrity allowing the withdrawal of the writ petition as per the request of the petitioner.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
MOHAMMED NIAS C.P., J
PRANAV NADUVILEPARAMBIL THANKAPPAN – Appellant
Versus
REGIONAL PASSPORT OFFICER – Respondent
WP(C) NO. 44149 OF 2025