SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(Ker) 55011

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
MOHAMMED NIAS C.P., J
AKASH NAIR – Appellant
Versus
THE SECRETARY, REGIONAL TRANSPORT AUTHORITY, PALAKKAD – Respondent


Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: SMT.G.CHITRA
For the Respondents: SMT. SURYA BINOY, SR. GP

J U D G M E N T

The writ petition is filed with the following prayers;

“i) To issue a writ of mandamus or any other appropriate writ, direction or order directing the respondent to consider and pass final orders on Ext.P2, application submitted by the petitioner for issuing a certified copy of the time schedule on the route Ponnani – Shornur in respect of stage carriage KL-52/K 5038, after giving an opportunity of hearing, forthwith, or at any rate within a time limit to be fixed by this Hon’ble Court, in the interest of justice.

ii) To issue any other appropriate writ, direction or order which this Hon’ble Court deem fit in the circumstances of the case.

iii) To dispense with the filing of translation of vernacular documents;”

2. Taking note of the fact that Ext.P2 request made by the petitioner for issuing a time schedule is pending consideration before the respondent, there will be a direction to the respondent to pass orders on the same, in accordance with law, within one month from the date of receipt of a copy of this judgment, on the petitioner complying with the statutory conditions.

The writ petition is disposed of as above.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top