Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
MOHAMMED NIAS C.P., J
VEENA.B.S. – Appellant
Versus
THE REGIONAL TRANSPORT AUTHORITY, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM – Respondent
WP(C) NO. 45845 OF 2025
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. direction for final orders by the tribunal (Para 1 , 2) |
JUDGMENT
Learned counsel for the petitioner impugns Ext.P6 interim order passed by the State Transport Appellate Tribunal in M.V.A.A. No.381 of 2025. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that he will be satisfied with a direction to the Tribunal to pass final orders in M.V.A.A. No.381 of 2025. This is recorded.
2. Accordingly, there will be a direction to the State Transport Appellate Tribunal, Ernakulam, to pass final orders in M.V.A.A. No.381 of 2025, untrammelled by any reason in Ext.P6 order, in accordance with law and after hearing the petitioner and the other affected parties, if any, at the earliest, at any rate, within two months from the date of receipt of a copy of this judgment.
The writ petition is disposed of as above.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
