Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
C.S.DIAS, J
CHINJITHKUMAR T.S. @SHIMJITH, RIYAZ @RIYAS M.K., SHABEER M.A. @SHAMEER, MOHAMMED RASHED @RASHID K.R. @RASHID, MUHAMMED RASHID N.M. @RASHID @MOHAMMED RASHID, MUHAMMED FAZIL E.K. @MUHAMMED FASIL, HAKKIM V.K. @HAKKIM, ABDUL MAJEED, RAZACK KUTTIYIL MOOSA @RASAQ, BASIL K.T. – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF KERALA – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. background of the case including trial court origin and accusations. (Para 1) |
| 2. the parties settled the dispute amicably and sought quashing. (Para 2 , 3 , 4 , 5) |
| 3. court evaluates inherent powers for quashing proceedings. (Para 6) |
| 4. final decision to quash proceedings due to amicable resolution. (Para 7) |
O R D E R Dated this the 5th day of December, 2025 The petitioners are the accused 1 to 10 in C.C.No.678/2025 on the file of the Court of the Judicial First Class Magistrate, Kunnamkulam (Trial Court), which has originated from Crime No.407/2021 registered by the Kunnamkulam Police Station, Thrissur, alleging the commission of the offences punishable under Sections 143 , 147, 148, 341, 324, 452 and 427 r/w Section 149 of the Indian Penal Code .
2. The petitioners have invoked the inherent jurisdiction of this Court under Section 528 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita , 2023, to quash all further proceedings in the above case. It is asserted that the dispute that led to the registration of the crime has been amicably settled between the petitioners and the respondents 2 to 9, who have executed Annexures A3 to A10 affidavits, affirming the settlement.
3. I
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
