Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
K. BABU, J
VENUGOPAL – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF KERALA – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. the petitioner is accused of committing fraud. (Para 1 , 2 , 3) |
| 2. nature of the allegations and petitioner’s stance. (Para 5 , 6) |
| 3. court's consideration of bail based on facts. (Para 8 , 9) |
| 4. conditions upon which bail is granted. (Para 10) |
O R D E R
This is an application filed under Section 482 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita , 2023.
2. The petitioner is accused No.1 in Crime No.904/2025 of Sulthanbathery Police Station. The offence alleged against the petitioner is punishable under Section
318(4) r/w Section 3(5) of the BNS.
3. The prosecution case, as narrated in Annexure A7 order, reads thus:-
“The 1st accused along with accused Nos.2 to 4, in furtherance of their common intention, deceived the defacto complainant by falsely claiming that the 1st accused is the owner of a tea estate at Thalappuzha in Mananthavady having an extent of 283 Acres which is intended for sale and with the intention of cheating and unlawfully obtaining money from the defacto complainant, on 11.03.2022, the 1st accused had executed an agreement with the defacto complainant fixing the price of the said property at 9,00,00,000/- (Rupees Nine crore only) and thereafter, appoint
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
