SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1986 Supreme(Online)(Ker) 13

KERALA HIGH COURT
Bhaskaran Nambiar, J.
K. C. ITOOP And SONS v. ANTONY


Table of Content
1. validity of unregistered leases. (Para 1 , 6)
2. facts of the contested lease and parties involved. (Para 2 , 3 , 4 , 5)
3. restrictions placed by statutory provisions. (Para 7 , 9 , 11 , 12 , 13)
4. court's interpretation of lease agreements. (Para 8 , 10 , 18)
5. consequences of unregistered document use. (Para 21)
6. remand for further proceedings. (Para 22 , 23)

1. The substantial question of law that arises for determination in this second appeal is:
"Whether a rent deed, compulsorily registerable under the Transfer of Property Act, executed by a tenant in favour of a landlord if not registered can be relied upon to establish the relationship existing between the parties?"

2. The building in this case belonged to a Namboodiri family and is now in possession of the defendant claiming to be a lessee inducted into possession in 1974 on the strength of an unregistered lease deed for a term of five years and on a monthly rent of Rs. 140/-. The rights of the Namboodiri family have been obtained by the plaintiff by assignment. The validity of that assignment is no longer in challenge. In the court, a counter part of the unregistered lease deed accepted by the Karanavan of














































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top