ABDURAHIMAN KUTTY HAJI v. NAFEESA BEEVI AND ANOTHER

Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation

1998 Supreme(Online)(Ker) 1448

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
G. Rajasekharan, J
ABDURAHIMAN KUTTY HAJI v. NAFEESA BEEVI AND ANOTHER

Table of Content
1. the basis of the partnership and the ownership of the lease. (Para 1 , 2 , 3 , 4)
2. court confirmation of findings on lease and partnership status. (Para 5 , 6 , 9 , 11)
3. final ruling on the sustainability of the suit. (Para 7 , 14)
4. arguments regarding the status of the appellant after dissolution. (Para 8)
5. clarification on the status of licensees post-revocation. (Para 10 , 12 , 13)

1.First defendant in a suit for rendition of accounts of a dissolved firm and mandatory injunction to put the plaintiff in possession of A and B Schedule properties and also prohibitory injunction restraining the defendants from entering in the premises, is the appellant.

2. Plaint A schedule property having an extent of 8 cents and the building thereon belongs to the plaintiff's mother inlaw. On 20th May 1976 the mother inlaw executed a lease in favour of the plaintiff, stipulating a rent of Rs. 125 per mensem. On 21st May 1976 the plaintiff and defendants entered into a partnership agreement as per Ext. A - 1 to start a business in the schedule premises. Ext. A - 1. partnership deed provides that the lease in favour of the plaintiff will continue as such, that the defendants sha

Click Here to Read the rest of this document