Back
KERALA HIGH COURT
Judge, J
Shahul Hameed v. Secretary RTA
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. petitioner seeks temporary permit due to expired regular permit. (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. arguments regarding untimely application for permit renewal. (Para 3 , 4) |
| 3. discussion on necessary authority procedures for permits. (Para 5 , 6) |
| 4. statutory requirements for timely renewal applications. (Para 7 , 8) |
| 5. court's conclusion on the validity of the permit application. (Para 9 , 10) |
1. Petitioner is a stage carriage operator on a regular permit on the route Guruvayur-Kozhikode. He was operating his vehicle as limited stop ordinary service. Permit was covered by a stage carriage KL-8/A 7695. Regular permit in respect of the said vehicle expired on 5-5-1998. Petitioner submitted an application for renewal of the permit. Being an inter district route, concurrence has to be obtained from sister authorities, ie., Regional Transport Authority, Kozhikode and Trichur, before renewing the same. According to petitioner that procedure is yet to be completed.
2. Petitioner, in the meantime, submitted an application before the Secretary, Regional Transport Authority, Malappuram, for a temporary permit pending renewal of the regular permit. Application was preferred under S.87(1)(d) of th
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
