SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2000 Supreme(Online)(Ker) 1060

KERALA HIGH COURT
, J
Kerala Public Service Commission – Appellant
Versus
Dr. K. R. Sreekala – Respondent
Writ Appeal | W.A. No. 2440 of 1999 | Original Petition | O. P. No. 11028 of 1996



Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: Sri. R. Rajasekharan Pillai
For the Respondents: Shri Poly Matthai

Children of inter caste marriages eligible for benefits if either parent belongs to SC/ST, irrespective of upbringing.

Headnote:(A) Government Order dated 25-1-1977 - Benefits for children of inter caste marriage - Status of Scheduled Tribe member sought - Claim denied on grounds of upbringing and cultural identity - Misinterpretation of caste status for educational reservations - Judicial recognition established for children's claims based on parental status regardless of cultural ties. (Paras 15-19)

(B) Public Service commission's authority in verifying caste for employment and educational benefits - Proper procedures mandated for substantiating community status - Court's clarify on the implications and limitations of caste recognition in legal entitlements. (Paras 12-14)

(C) Findings indicate that the petitioner, claiming Scheduled Tribe status based on maternal heritage, is entitled to reservations for PG medical admissions. (Paras 20-22)

Facts of the case:
The petitioner, a medical graduate, claimed Scheduled Tribe status based on her mother’s community which was scrutinized by KIRTADS leading to her applications for educational reservations being rejected, which prompted legal action.

Findings of Court:
The court established that, given the matrilineal claim, the petitioner is entitled to leverage her mother's Scheduled Tribe status for benefits set out in related government orders.

Issues: The main question revolved around whether the applicant's entitlement to benefits as a child of an inter caste marriage was affected by her upbringing and social representation.

Ratio Decidendi: The court held that merely being raised in a non-Scheduled Tribe context does not negate eligibility for benefits provided the standard of parental community membership is fulfilled.

Result: Original petition allowed.

1W.A. No. 2440 of 1999 is filed by the Kerala Public Service Commission against the interim order dated 30-9-1999 in C.M.P. No. 7368 of 1999 in O. P. No. 11028 of 1996 directing the Public Service Commission to advise Dr. K. R. Sreekala, for appointment as Assistant Civil Surgeon, provisionally, accepting the caste status claimed by her. If she is otherwise entitled to. When the Original Petition came up for hearing, learned single Judge referred the Original Petition for being heard along with the appeal. Hence we are disposing of the appeal as well as the Original Petition by a common order. We narrate the facts as stated in the Writ Petition.

2 Petitioner is a practising allopathy doctor. She passed her M.B.B.S. and was aspiring for higher studies. She applied for admission to P. G. Medical Course in the year 1992. She applied in the quota earmarked for Scheduled Tribe. Petitioner's mother belongs to Hindu Malai Arayan community, which is a Scheduled Tribe community recognised by the Presidential Order. Petitioner's father belongs to Valan community, a Other Backward Class community in the State. In pursuance to her application she was permitted to appear for the examination. She appeared, but the result was not published. Instead, petitioner was served with Ext. P6 letter dated 20-5-1992 from the Office of the Commissioner for Entrance Examinations stating that the Screening Committee entertained some doubts whether petitioner could be considered for admission to the seats ear marked for Scheduled Caste/ Scheduled Tribe and therefore it was decided to refer the said question to KIRTADS. It was pointed out that the Screening Committee would take further action only after getting a report from the KIRTADS. Petitioner then sent all the relevant documents to KIRTADS to show that her mother belongs to Hindu Malai Arayan community, therefore entitled to get the benefit of reservation for admission to educational institutions. Petitioner did not get any reply. Corise quently, she did not apply for the year 1993.

3 Petitioner during the year 1994-95 submitted an application dated 12-4-1994 for admission to Post Graduate Medical Course. Petitioner then received a reply dated 12-4-1994 stating that her application dated 12-4-1994 was considered by the Screening Committee and the Screening Committee entertained some doubts as to whether petitioner is eligible for consideration to the eats reserved for Scheduled Caste/Scheduled Tribe. Petitioner was therefore informed that the matter had been referred to KIRTADS. She was also informed that her application would be considered only after getting a report from the KIRTADS. The officers of the KIRTADS made an enquiry after issuing notice to the petitioner's father on her behalf. KIRTADAS noted that the candidates claim for ST status rests on her mother. Investigating officers of the KIRTADS had interviewed the candidate's father, mother and family members. In the enquiry the KIRTADS found that the petitioner's mother belongs to Malai Arayan community. It was also noted that the claim of the petitioner rests on G.O. (MS) No. 11/77 dated 25-1-1977. Dealing with the merits of the case, KIRTADS stated as follows :
"The claim of the candidate for Scheduled Tribe Malai Arayan status rests on G.O. (MS) No. 11/77 dated 25th January 1977, wherein it has been stated that: "the children will be treated as belonging to Scheduled Castes or Scheduled Tribe community if either of the parents belongs to that community".
Just a few months later the Government of India quoting the legal view, vide letter No. 39/77/73/SCST/1 dated 21st May 1977, has directed all State Governments to determine the caste status of the off springs born of a couple where one of the spouses is a member of a Scheduled Tribe, subject to the legal view expressed by various High Courts and Supreme Court of India and also in the light of existing facts and circumstances in such cases".
The KIRTADS in its report held as follows: "The cand
























































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top