SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2002 Supreme(Online)(Ker) 925

KERALA HIGH COURT
R. Bhaskaran, J.
Vadakkencherry Panchayat v. Abdul Jabbar


Table of Content
1. claims regarding tenant rights and auction authority. (Para 1 , 2 , 3)
2. disputes over the validity of circular directives on tenancy. (Para 4 , 5 , 6)
3. authority of the panchayat under statutory rules. (Para 7 , 8 , 9)
4. final legal determinations regarding appeals and decrees. (Para 10 , 11)

1. In all these second appeals, a common question is involved and hence they were heard together and are being disposed of by this common judgment. The appeals are filed by the Executive Office and President of Vadakkencherry Panchayat. All the suits were by the occupants of the shop rooms owned by the Panchayat. Since the facts are similar in all the cases it is sufficient if the facts in one case is stated. The difference with regard to other cases are only in the dates of entrustment and amounts of rent. In O.S. No. 61 of 1988, the plaintiff was entrusted with room No. 3 of the shopping complex owned by the panchayat. He was the successful bidder in auction conducted by the Panchayat. The monthly rent was fixed at Rs. 610/-. Ext. B1 is the agreement executed by the plaintiff and the Executive Officer of the Panchayat. The agreement is for a period of one year from 1/04/1

















Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top