SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2006 Supreme(Online)(Ker) 3050

KERALA HIGH COURT
Thottathil B. Radhakrishnan, J.
E. Sankaran v. Union of India and Others


1 This writ petition is filed seeking to quash the decision contained in Ext. P2 and for a direction to the respondents to grant the petitioner 20% of the amount seized by the respondents on 20-4-1989 from the firm M/s. Kushiram Ramchand.

2 The allegation of the petitioner is that on information given by him, certain undisclosed income was deleted amounts confiscated and accordingly, he is entitled to 20% of the amounts detected and confiscated as a reward.

3 The petitioner filed O. P.14774/1993, before this Court, which was disposed of as per Ext. P1 directing that untrammelled by any of the contentions raised in the counter affidavit in that case, the petitioner's case shall be reconsidered by the Chairman of the Central Board of direct taxes. The Chairman was to issue orders with notice to the petitioner.

4 It is thereafter that Ext. P2 has been issued by stating that the Competent Committee consisting of the members stated in Ext. P2 have, after giving opportunity to the petitioner of being heard, decided that the reward of Rs. 1,50,000/- already paid to the petitioner is proper on the facts and circumstances of the case. If is stated on Ext. P2 that the Committee after carefully













Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top