Back
KERALA HIGH COURT
A. M. Shaffique, J
Sunil @ Suni and Others v. Deputy Superintendent of Police Alappuzha
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. bail applications filed under specific sections. (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. contentions raised regarding media influence and inconsistencies. (Para 3 , 13 , 15) |
| 3. importance of protecting witness integrity emphasized. (Para 4 , 20 , 21) |
| 4. details of the murder incident provided. (Para 5 , 6) |
| 5. legal rationale for denying bail outlined. (Para 22) |
| 6. final outcome of the bail application. (Para 24) |
1. Bail Application No. 5832 of 2009 is filed by Sunil alias Suni (accused No. 7), Aneesh Kumar (accused No. 9), Binoy Markose alias Binoy (accused No. 10) and Jain Jose alias Jain (accused No. 11) in Crime No. 197 of 2009 of Nedumudy Police Station. Bail Application No. 6088 of 2009 is filed by Shino Paul (Accused No. 4) and Akash Sasidharan alias Rajesh (accused No. 5) in the aforesaid Crime. The Bail Applications are under S.439 of the Code of Criminal Procedure .
2. The offences alleged against the accused persons, 25 in number, are under S.143, 147, 148, 324, 302, 120B, 201 and 212 of the Indian Penal Code and S.5 of the Explosive Substances Act.
3. The case is popularly known as Paul Muthoot murder case. It is said that visual media and print media in the State had closely co
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
