1. Ext. P3 order passed by the 5th respondent / Lok Ayukta, authorising and directing the District Police Chief, Palakkad, to conduct a ‘preliminary investigation’ in respect of the allegations in Ext. P1 complaint, is under challenge in this writ petition preferred by the petitioner, who is arrayed as the 3rd respondent in the complaint.

2. The main ground of challenge is that, Ext. P3 order is beyond the power, competence and jurisdiction of the 5th respondent as far as ‘preliminary enquiry’ is covered and that there is clear violation of statutory prescription, particularly under S.9(3) of the Kerala Lok Ayuktha Act, 1999, insofar as no copy of the complaint was forwarded to the petitioner before ordering the ‘preliminary investigation’ and no opportunity of hearing was given to submit any explanation. There is also a case that the proceedings are per se wrong and unsustainable, insofar as ‘State’ is not a party to the proceedings and that there is infringement of S.9(8) of the Act as well.

3. Coming to the factual scenario, the petitioner is a Member of the Legislative Assembly from the Ollur constituency in Trissur District. It is stated that, the petitioner is leading a transpa