KERALA HIGH COURT
Sri. Devan Ramachandran, J
Najeeb M. K. v. Shoukath Ali and Others
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. the application of the interim order and the rationale for seeking modification. (Para 2 , 3) |
| 2. interpretation and implications of r.12 and relevant environmental laws. (Para 4 , 6) |
| 3. final ruling reaffirming the necessity of environmental clearance for quarrying. (Para 7 , 8) |
1. Heard Sri. Devan Ramachandran, learned counsel appearing for the appellant.
2. This writ appeal has been filed against order dated 7th July, 2015 passed by the learned Single Judge refusing modification of the interim order dated 25th March, 2015.
3. The 6th respondent, who is the appellant before us, had filed an application seeking modification of an interim order by which learned Single Judge has restrained the 6th respondent from carrying on quarrying operation. The 6th respondent has filed the application for modification of the interim order on the strength of a renewed permit. 6th respondent's case is that the permit which was already granted to him was renewed by an order dated 6/5/2015. He submits that learned Single Judge committed error in refusing to modify the interim order. He submits that on the strength of the proviso to R.12 of Kerala Minor Mineral Concession Rules , 2015,
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.