Back
KERALA HIGH COURT
A. M. Bhattacharjee, J
BHEL Electrical Machines Ltd. v. BHEL EML Employees Association Kasaragod and Others
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. the court examines the challenge to the retirement age enhancement from 58 to 60 years. (Para 1 , 4) |
| 2. responses affirming the binding nature of government guidelines on retirement age. (Para 5 , 6 , 14) |
| 3. the court confirms the legality of the guidelines under scrutiny. (Para 9 , 20) |
| 4. evaluation of statutory authority decisions within employment law. (Para 22) |
| 5. concluding that the petitioners are entitled to retire at the enhanced age. (Para 24 , 25) |
1. WP (C) No. 32073 of 2014 is filed by the petitioner seeking to quash Exts. P6 and P11 orders passed by 4th and 5th Respondents respectively to the extent it enhanced the age of retirement of the workmen of the petitioner from 58 years to 60 years by the 4th Respondent and affirmed in appeal by the 5th Respondent and for other related reliefs. The other two writ petitions are filed by workmen of the petitioner establishment in WP (C) No. 32073 of 2014 to declare that they are entitled to continue in service till they attain the age of 60 years. I will consider WP (C) No. 32073 of 2014 in which the petitioner in WP (C) No. 34277 of 2014 is the additional 6th Respondent. The subject matter of these cases revolve ro
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
