1. The unsuccessful plaintiffs have instituted this Second Appeal impugning the concurrent findings of the trial court as well as the lower appellate court. The plaintiffs / appellants filed suit for injunction with the averment that plaint A schedule property belongs to the 1st plaintiff, who is claimed to be in possession of the same from 1969 onwards and that a building in the property is being used as go - down and office for the rubber business run by him. That B schedule property belongs to the 2nd plaintiff, which lies on the southern side of A schedule property and that the 2nd plaintiff is residing with family in the building situated therein. That C schedule property is said to be a water course through the southern side of A schedule and eastern side of B schedule, which is said to have a length of 80 ft. and width of 2.5 feet. That it is the o