Back
KERALA HIGH COURT
A.M. Shaffique, J
Joseph P. C. v. P. C. George and Others
1. Through this election petition, the petitioner, who has contested as one of the candidates in No. 101, Poonjar Legislative Assembly Constituency, challenges the election of the returned candidate, who is the first respondent herein. The first respondent secured a total of 63,621 votes and is far ahead of the next candidate who secured only 35,800 votes. The petitioner, who is 3rd in the list, has secured 22,270 votes only. The petitioner challenges the election of the returned candidate on the grounds under S.100(1)(d)(i) and S.100(1)(b) read with S.123 of the Representation of the People Act, 1951 (hereinafter referred to as 'the Act').
2. According to the petitioner, the first respondent had deliberately suppressed vital information which ought to have been disclosed in the affidavit filed along with the nomination paper, thereby the acceptance of his nomination was improper. It has been pleaded that the first respondent had suppressed the existence of building No. 147(A) in Ward No. 14 of Erattupetta Municipality in the name of his wife Smt. Usha George, and an office having a plinth area of 600 sq. ft. in block No. 47 of the Erattupetta Village. It has also been pleaded that
Lack of precise pleadings in election petitions can lead to dismissal.
The failure to provide a concise statement of material facts in an election petition renders it liable for summary dismissal under Sections 83 and 100 of the Representation of People Act.
Allegations of corrupt practice in an election petition must be supported by specific material facts and full particulars as required by Section 83 of the RP Act of 1951. Failure to plead such materi....
The Election Petition must contain a concise statement of material facts and full particulars of any alleged corrupt practice, and demonstrate how the result of the election was materially affected b....
Election petitions must include precise material facts to establish a cause of action; failure to do so warrants dismissal per statutory requirements.
Failure to comply with statutory requirements regarding material facts and submission of integral documents renders an election petition dismissible at the threshold.
Election petitions must contain concise statements of material facts; omission of a single material fact leads to dismissal for lack of cause of action.
The election petition must contain concise material facts and full particulars of any corrupt practice, and failure to disclose even a single material fact would entail dismissal of the election peti....
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
