Back
KERALA HIGH COURT
, J
District Registrar – Appellant
Versus
Primary Agricultural Bank – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. petitioner aimed to advance agricultural tasks receiving government aid. (Para 1 , 2 , 3 , 4 , 5) |
| 2. appellants contested eligibility for stamp duty remission. (Para 6 , 9) |
| 3. court asserted compliance with provisions for stamp duty exemptions. (Para 8 , 10 , 11 , 12 , 13) |
1. Appellants 1 and 2, the District Registrar and Sub Registrar, who were respondents 1 and 2 in W. P. (C) No. 18759/2012, challenge judgment dated 04/02/2015 therein whereby the learned Single Judge quashed Ext.P10 order and Ext.P11 notice demanding stamp duty.
2. The facts emerging from the pleadings are as follows:
The respondent herein is the petitioner in W. P. (C) No. 18759/2012 (hereinafter referred to as 'the petitioner' for clarity) and is a Primary Agricultural Bank. The petitioner wanted to install Poly House and Tissue Culture Lab and Nursery. Government sanctioned Rs. 5.60 lakhs as grant towards share capital and subsidy, for that purpose. The Bank decided to construct a godown and shopping complex for procuring agricultural products and marketing the same.
3. For this purpose, the Bank resolved to purchase 16.480 cents of land for Rs. 82,23,520/- from one of its members. Ext.P3 resoluti
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
