Back
KERALA HIGH COURT
N. Nagaresh, J.
Joy C. P. v. State of Kerala and Others
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. petitioner challenges order cancellation. (Para 1 , 2 , 3 , 4 , 5) |
| 2. arguments concerning procedural irregularities. (Para 6 , 7) |
| 3. authorities describe proceedings and decisions. (Para 8 , 9) |
| 4. court hears arguments and records observations. (Para 10 , 11) |
| 5. charges and defense presented. (Para 12 , 13 , 14) |
| 6. court's critical review of orders. (Para 15 , 16 , 17 , 18) |
| 7. orders quashed; remand for reconsideration. (Para 19) |
1. The petitioner challenges Ext.P10 order of the 2nd respondent - Commissioner of Civil Supplies and Ext.P14 order passed by the 1st respondent - State of Kerala.
2. The petitioner was the authorized licensee of ARD No.150 of Thrissur Taluk. The District Supply Officer, on 11.07.2008, detected some irregularities in the vicinity of the retail outlet of the petitioner. It was found that 5 sacks of rice were being transported from the shop of the petitioner in an autorickshaw. The autorickshaw was intercepted.
3. On 10.12.2008, Ext.P1 charge memo was served on the petitioner. In Ext.P1, it was alleged that the articles were seized outside the shop room and the shop was not permitted to be opened. The petitioner submitted Ext.P2 reply dated 20.12.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
