KERALA HIGH COURT
, CJ
Varghese M. P. and Others v. V. P. Devassia and Another
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. contempt cases referred for analysis (Para 1 , 2 , 3) |
| 2. constitutional provisions for contempt jurisdiction (Para 6 , 8 , 11 , 12) |
| 3. rules must align with constitutional powers (Para 27 , 30 , 34) |
| 4. striking down overreaching contempt rules (Para 46 , 47) |
| 5. matter referred back to learned single judges (Para 48) |
1. Instant contempt cases are posted before us, based on the reference orders passed by learned Single Judges of this Court dated 09/01/2015 and 30/10/2019 respectively. In the reference order dated 09/01/2015 in Cont. Case (C) No. 1073 of 2014, it is stated thus:
“Issue for Reference:
Whether Jyothilal (supra) has laid down the correct law in concluding in paragraph 24 of the judgment while declaring: [H]igh Court Rules clearly indicate, after taking cognizance when notice is issued by the Division Bench, unless the respondent contemnor is exempted from personal appearance, he should necessarily appear before the Court. Till then there is no requirement for the appearance of the respondent contemnor especially for the limited purpose of making an enquiry whether a prima facie case is made out to refer the matter to a Division Bench or not.”
Accordingly, I di
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.