Back
KERALA HIGH COURT
, J
Principal DM WIMS College of Pharmacy v. Pharmacy Council of India Kotla and Others
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. establishment and application for d.pharm course. (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. arguments regarding necessity of noc. (Para 4 , 5) |
| 3. evaluation of statutory provisions and regulations. (Para 6 , 12 , 14) |
| 4. determination on the necessity of consent requirement. (Para 15) |
| 5. final directives regarding reconsideration of application. (Para 16) |
1. Petitioner is the Principal of a Self Financing Pharmacy College. The petitioner's College was established in the year 2016. The College started with B.Pharm with an intake capacity of 100. It is stated that the Educational Agency of the College is running a Medical College. This is situated in Wayanad District. Since this is a composite program and the institution had all the infrastructural and instructional facilities to provide more courses in the field of Pharmacy, the Educational Agency wanted to add on courses in Pharmacy, in the College. Therefore, the petitioner applied to the Pharmacy Council of India for approval to start Pharm.D, M.Pharm and D.Pharm courses.
2. Pharm.D is an integrated course of six years leading to doctoral degree. All these applications were given in 2020. The petitioner was on a bona fide belief that for grant
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
