SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2022 Supreme(Online)(Ker) 63576

KERALA STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM
Not mentioned, Not mentioned
Opposite Party – Appellant
Versus
Complainant – Respondent


Table of Content
1. appeal against order regarding payment and compensation. (Para 1 , 2 , 5)
2. details of evidence and proceedings in lower forum. (Para 3 , 4)
3. counsel's argument regarding evidence and delays. (Para 9 , 10 , 11)
4. court found district forum's order lawful. (Para 12 , 13)
5. final judgment of dismissal. (Para 14)

1. The opposite party in C.C. No. 381/2013 of the Consumer Disputes Redressal Forum, Ernakulam (in short the District Forum) has filed the appeal against the order passed by the District Forum by which he was directed to refund an amount of Rs. 5,85,709 with interest @12% per annum from 14.11.2012 till realisation, to pay Rs. 1,00,000 as compensation and Rs. 5,000 as costs to the complainant. He was also directed to dismantle the work done by him with costs without making any damage to the present building after making the above payment.

2. The averments contained in the complaint in brief are as follows:
The complainant had entrusted the truss work along with the other structural works of his newly constructed residential building with the opposite party. The opposite party agreed to do the work for an amount of Rs. 5,72,135. He had also agreed to complete t













Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top