SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2022 Supreme(Online)(Ker) 63604

KERALA HIGH COURT
A.M. Babu, J
Muraleedharan Nair v. P. Usha Kumari


Table of Content
1. details about the indigent petitioner's financial status. (Para 1 , 2 , 5 , 6)
2. discussion on the report from the district collector regarding the petitioner's assets. (Para 3 , 4)
3. legal standards for determining 'sufficient means' and considerations for indigence. (Para 7 , 8 , 9)
4. final decision allowing the petitioner to proceed without paying court fees. (Para 10)

1. The petitioner - appellant filed the C.M.C.P. seeking leave to file the appeal as an indigent person, invoking the provisions of Order XLIV , R.1 and R.3 read with Order XXXIII , R.1 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 .

2. The appeal is filed against the judgment and decree in O.S.No.1244 of 2009 on the file of the Principal Sub Court, Thiruvananthapuram. The decree allowed the respondent to realise an amount of Rs.53 lakhs along with interest and costs from the petitioner. The petitioner contends that the said judgment and decree are incorrect and unsustainable in law. The court fee to be levied and paid in the appeal is Rs.8,29,298/-. The petitioner is not in a position to raise enough funds for making payment of the court fees. He is a pensioner, drawing a monthly pension of Rs.29,500/-.













Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top