1. The petitioner alleges that, in spite of the affirmative declarations in Ext.P3 judgment, the 1st respondent - Kerala State Co - operative Employees Pension Board (Board for short), has not reckoned the remittance made in his account by the 4th respondent - Society from 27.09.1997; and has granted him pensionary benefits, reckoning the same only with effect from 01.04.2002. He asserts that this is illegal and unlawful, particularly when Ext.P3 judgment makes it very clear that he was entitled to be regularised in service retrospectively with effect from 27.09.1997, though the monetary benefits were ordered to be paid only with effect from 01.04.2002.

2. Sri.Shiju Kamalasanan - learned counsel for the petitioner, argued that, going by Ext.P3 judgment, though his client was regularised in service - thus being entitled to all benefits thereafter - actual payment of monetary be