Back
KERALA STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM
* K. Surendra Mohan (President), Ranjit. R. (Member)
Aneesh T. R. v. Suja Manoj
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. maintainability of the complaint based on statutory duties. (Para 1 , 2 , 3) |
| 2. discussion on the arguments regarding statutory service regulation. (Para 4 , 5 , 6) |
| 3. examination of consumer protection definitions in relation to statutory services. (Para 7 , 8 , 9 , 10) |
| 4. statutory powers do not equate to consumer services under the act. (Para 11 , 12) |
1. The complainant in C.C. No. 256/2020 of the Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission, Alappuzha (District Commission for short) is the appellant. This appeal is filed against an order dated 16.2.2021 in I.A. No. 16/2021 finding that the complaint was not maintainable. The Interlocutory Application appears to have been filed for the purpose of considering the question of maintainability of the complaint as a preliminary issue. Accordingly, as per the order under appeal, the complaint has been dismissed as not maintainable. A review petition preferred by the appellant has also been dismissed with costs.
2. The facts in this case fall within a very narrow compass. The appellant is the owner of an extent of 9.71 Ares of property in Vayalar Panchayat. He is residing in a building situate in the said property. He wants to
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
