SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(Online)(Ker) 53619

KERALA HIGH COURT
P. V. Kunhikrishnan, J.
Krishnankutty v. District Collector Thrissur


Table of Content
1. procedures for writ petitions and statutory remedies under the kerala act. (Para 1 , 2 , 3)

1. These two writ petitions are connected and therefore, I am disposing these writ petitions by a common judgment.

2. The prayers in these writ petitions are as follows:
W.P.(C). No.31273/2011:
i. Issue a writ of certiorari quashing Exhibit - P1 & Exhibit - P3 orders passed by the 1st respondent and 2nd respondent respectively.
ii. Such other reliefs this Honorable Court deems fit and proper to grant in the facts and circumstances of the case. (SIC)
W.P.(C). No.20624/2011:
i. Issue a writ of certiorari quashing Exhibit - P1 & Exhibit - P3 orders passed by the 1st respondent and 2nd respondent respectively.
ii. Such other reliefs this Honorable Court deems fit and proper to grant in the facts and circumstances of the case. (SIC)

3. The impugned orders in these writ petitions are passed by the Government by which the direction of the District Collector to restore the land as paddy land is confirmed. As per the Kerala Conservation of Paddy Land and Wetland Act , 2008 (for short, Act 2008), the petitioners have got remedy to convert the nature of land. The petitioners are free to app

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top