Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA
Anu Sivaraman, J
Union of India – Appellant
Versus
Central Industrial Security Force (CISF) – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. transport allowance entitlement for cisf personnel. (Para 1 , 3) |
| 2. allegations of discrimination among cisf units. (Para 4 , 6) |
| 3. judicial evaluation of discrimination and duty scope. (Para 5 , 7 , 8) |
| 4. judicial directives on administrative consideration of allowance claims. (Para 9 , 10) |
1. The respondents in W.P(C) No.17061/21 and W.P(C) No.16755/21 are the appellants respectively in the afore - captioned writ appeals. Both these writ petitions were disposed of by the learned Single Judge as per judgment dated 29.09.2021, which allowed the writ petitions. The said judgment is under challenge in these appeals. The issue which was agitated before the Tribunal pertains to non grant of Transport Allowance to the petitioners, who are the CISF personnel posted at CISF Unit, Cochin Port Trust. There are as many as 103 petitioners in WP.(C)No.16755/2i and a single petitioner in W.P.(C)No.17061/21. Transport Allowance was denied on the premise that the petitioners were provided with Government transport facility to commute from the assembly point (quarter guard) to the place of duty and vise - versa. Whereas, the same was claimed by the petitioners in the writ petitions,
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
