Back
KERALA HIGH COURT
A. Muhamed Mustaque, J
Pramosh Vettiyattil and Premkumar K.S. – Appellant
Versus
Malabar Devaswom Board – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. claims of management must align with statutory provisions. (Para 2 , 4 , 10 , 12) |
| 2. court acknowledges ongoing disputes affecting temple administration. (Para 5 , 6 , 11) |
| 3. statutory authority has precedence over traditional management claims. (Para 7 , 14 , 19) |
1. W.P.(C)Nos.11120 of 2023, 21724 of 2023, 12891 of 2023 and of 2023: - The common issue involved in these writ petitions relates to the management of Kapliyangad Sree Bhagavathi Temple in Chavakkad Taluk, having Serial No.1190 in Appendix 1B schedule (non - listed) temples in notification No.HR3/5691/93 dated 15.02.1994 issued by the Commissioner of the erstwhile Hindu Religious Charitable Endowment (Administration) Department.
2. W.P.(C)No.11120 of 2023: - This writ petition is one filed by Pramosh Vettiyattil and Premkumar K.S., who are stated to be the Patron and President respectively of Kapliyangad Sree Bhagavathi Kshetra Bharana Samithi, seeking a writ of mandamus restraining the 6th respondent Assistant Commissioner of Police, Guruvayur not to interfere with the administration / management and affairs of Kapliyangad Sree Bhagavathi Temple, Konkkanappetty, Chavakkad Taluk. The petitioners have als
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
