SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(Online)(Ker) 72772

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA
K. BABU, J.
Shoma G. Madan v. Kerala State


Table of Content
1. the petitioners sought to quash the final report regarding car registration. (Para 1)
2. the alleged offences relate to forgery under ipc. (Para 2)
3. the definitions of forgery involve deceit and wrongful gain. (Para 3 , 4 , 5)
4. the court found no evidence supporting the prosecution's case. (Para 6)

1. The petitioners, the accused in C.C.No.528 of 2018 on the file of the Judicial First Class Magistrate Court - I, Kodungallur, seek to quash the final report and all further proceedings in the Calendar Case. The facts leading to the registration of the crime and submission of the final report are as follows: -
Petitioner No.1 is the wife of the deceased Amal. Petitioner No.2 is the brother of petitioner No.1. The defacto complainant is the father of the deceased Amal. The late Amal had owned a Maruti Ritz Car, which remained in the possession of petitioner No.1 after his death. Petitioner No.1, with the aid of petitioner No.2, submitted documents for the permanent registration of the Maruti Ritz Car in the name of Amal after his death. Petitioner No.1 submitted the application seeking registration before the Regional Transport Office, Kodungallur. Petitioner Nos.1 an
















Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top