IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA
K. BABU, J.
Shoma G. Madan v. Kerala State
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. the petitioners sought to quash the final report regarding car registration. (Para 1) |
| 2. the alleged offences relate to forgery under ipc. (Para 2) |
| 3. the definitions of forgery involve deceit and wrongful gain. (Para 3 , 4 , 5) |
| 4. the court found no evidence supporting the prosecution's case. (Para 6) |
1. The petitioners, the accused in C.C.No.528 of 2018 on the file of the Judicial First Class Magistrate Court - I, Kodungallur, seek to quash the final report and all further proceedings in the Calendar Case. The facts leading to the registration of the crime and submission of the final report are as follows: -
Petitioner No.1 is the wife of the deceased Amal. Petitioner No.2 is the brother of petitioner No.1. The defacto complainant is the father of the deceased Amal. The late Amal had owned a Maruti Ritz Car, which remained in the possession of petitioner No.1 after his death. Petitioner No.1, with the aid of petitioner No.2, submitted documents for the permanent registration of the Maruti Ritz Car in the name of Amal after his death. Petitioner No.1 submitted the application seeking registration before the Regional Transport Office, Kodungallur. Petitioner Nos.1 an
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.