1. The petitioner joined the service of the 1st respondent Bank as a 'Peon' on 23.11.2017. She was confirmed in service after completing her probation. She has approached this Court being aggrieved by ExtP17 order issued by the President of 1st respondent holding that the appointment of the petitioner was illegal and the consequent order of termination from service. The petitioner asserts that the action is against the mandate of the Kerala Co - operative Societies Act and the Rules framed thereunder

2. Sri. Swathi Kumar B.S, the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that it is pursuant to the directions issued by this Court in Exts.P14 and P15 judgments that Ext.P17 was passed. The learned counsel submits that this Court had directed that all relevant aspects and rival claims be considered and the statutory provisions scrupulously adhered to while taking a decision. Referring to Ext.P17, it is submitted that none of these aspects were considered by the concerned respondent while passing Ext.P17 order.

3. In response, the learned Government Pleader, as well as the learned counsel appearing for the Society submits that the petitioner has an equally efficacious remedy in