SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(Ker) 55466

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA
C. JAYACHANDRAN, J.
Neha Nair v. State of Kerala


Table of Content
1. judicial integrity and qualification verification. (Para 1 , 2 , 3)
2. need for institutional frameworks to handle disputes. (Para 4 , 5 , 6)
3. interim participation allowed. (Para 7)

1. Amongst the innumerable Writ Petitions, which stems from the School Kalotsavam, this one is peculiar and is of a grievous nature. The allegation levelled by the petitioner is one with respect to the competence of one among the three Judges in the panel. The conduct of the said Judge is grievously alarming to the extent that a candidate, who otherwise performed poorly in the estimation of two other Judges, has been given 10 marks by the 3rd Judge, whose competence is at stake, with the result, the said candidate had emerged successful at the first position, to the detriment of the other candidates, who were estimated to have performed well by the two other Judges.

2. This Court wanted the matter to be addressed in detail. Accordingly, Sri. P. Santhosh Kumar, learned Special Government Pleader has appeared. He would hand over a declaration given by the 3rd Judge by name Sreekutty Vinod, wherein her educational qualification is seen stated as B. A. Mohiniyattam, with a Diploma in Kuchi

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top