SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(Ker) 55564

KERALA HIGH COURT
, J
Mathukutty v. Mukesh Kumar


Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: [List of names]
For the Respondents: [List of names]

Table of Content
1. introductory remarks on the appeal context. (Para 1 , 2 , 4)
2. discussion on performance of contract and implications of advance money. (Para 8 , 11)
3. conditions and implications of forfeiture and performance. (Para 14 , 20)
4. final decision affirming the trial court's ruling. (Para 30 , 31)

1. This regular first appeal has been filed under S.96 read with Order XLI R.1 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, challenging the decree and judgment dated 30/07/2013 in O.S. No.80/2012 on the files of the Sub Court, Pathanamthitta. The appellant herein is the defendant and the respondent herein is the plaintiff.

2. Heard the learned counsel for appellant and the learned counsel appearing for the respondent, in detail. Perused the verdict under challenge, the records of the trial court and the decisions placed by both sides.

3. Parties in this appeal shall be referred with reference to their status before the trial court.

4. The plaintiff filed suit seeking return of advance money to the tune of Rs.3 Lakh with 12% interest, contending that the defendant has improperly declined to perform his part of contract inspite of willingness of the plaintiff to execute the sale deed in



















Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top