SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(Ker) 55663

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
Devan Ramachandran, M.B. SNEHALATHA, JJ
ANWAR SADATH – Appellant
Versus
1 NADIA V H – Respondent
OP (FC) NO. 735 OF 2025



Withdrawal of petition does not bar subsequent petitions for relief.

Headnote:This judgment concerns OP (FC) No. 735 of 2025 where the court addresses the petitioner's request to withdraw the original petition. The petition was dismissed as withdrawn, permitting the parties to seek appropriate reliefs in law. The withdrawal was facilitated by the acknowledgment of a procedural predicament regarding Ext.P7. The outcome maintains legal avenues for further proceedings.

JUDGMENT Devan Ramachandran, J.

After arguing this matter for some time, Smt.Preeja V.P. -learned counsel for the petitioner – presumably being aware of the predicament of her client that Ext.P7 has not been challenged – sought permission to withdraw this Original Petition, with liberty being reserved to her client to move this Court or the learned Family Court appropriately with properly constituted reliefs.

In the afore circumstances, this Original Petition is dismissed as having been withdrawn; with every liberty available to the parties being reserved to them in law.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top