The absence of representation by the petitioner led to dismissal of the writ petition under Article 226 due to failure to demonstrate bona fides for discretionary relief.

J U D G M E N T

When the matter was taken up for consideration on 04-12-2025 there was no representation on behalf of the petitioner. Accordingly the matter was adjourned to be listed on today. Today also there is no representation for the petitioner.

2. The learned counsel appearing for the respondent bank submits that as on 25-02-2025 nearly Rs.76,00,000/- is due from the petitioner on account of two loans availed by him. It is also submitted that the condition imposed in the interim order dated 18-11-2025 requiring the petitioner to deposit a sum of Rs.5,00,000/- has not been complied with by the petitioner. Taking all the facts into consideration, I am of the view that the petitioner has not proved bonafides entitling him to discretionary relief from this Court under Article 226 of the Constitution of India. Accordingly this writ petition will stand dismissed.