Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
MR. JOHNSON JOHN, J
DR.K.S.VISWANADHA MALLAN – Appellant
Versus
THE STATE OF KERALA – Respondent
CRL.A NO. 1905 OF 2007
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. appeal concerning acquittal under section 138. (Para 2) |
| 2. no representation leads to closure of proceedings. (Para 3) |
J U D G M E N T
This appeal by the complainant is against the acquittal of the accused for the offence under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act .
3. When there was no representation for the appellant, this Court issued notice to the appellant. The memo filed by the learned Public Prosecutor and the report of the District Police Chief shows that the notice is duly served to the appellant on 20-11-2025. In spite of service of notice to the appellant, he has not turned up to prosecute the matter and today also, there is no representation for the appellant In that circumstance, the proceedings are closed.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
