SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(Ker) 55687

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
VIJU ABRAHAM, J
SIRAJUDEEN – Appellant
Versus
THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR, ALAPPUZHA – Respondent
WP(C) NO. 19664 OF 2020



Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: SHRI.B.PRAMOD, SMT.NAMITHA JYOTHISH
For the Respondents: SMT.JASMIN

Dismissal of civil petitions occurs when petitioners choose not to pursue their claims.

Headnote:The court observed that the petitioners are not pursuing the writ petition and consequently dismissed it as not pressed. The judgment emphasizes the discretionary nature of the court's admissions in civil petitions governed by procedural rules. The outcome demonstrates the court's role in managing cases efficiently without delving into substantive issues when parties elect not to proceed.

JUDGMENT

The learned counsel for the petitioners submitted that the petitioners are not pressing this matter. Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed as not pressed.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top