Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation

2025 Supreme(Online)(Ker) 55693

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
BECHU KURIAN THOMAS, J
AMAL – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF KERALA – Respondent
CRL.A NO. 2187 OF 2025

Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: SHRI.JERRY MATHEW, SMT.DEVIKA K.R., SMT.SANTRA ANIX KALLUZHATHIL, SMT.PARVATHY GIRISH, SHRI.VISHNUPRASAD P.S.
For the Respondents: SMT.G.VIDYA, SRI. NOUSHAD K.A., PUBLIC PROSECUTOR

Withdrawal of appeal allowed with liberty to approach Special Court.

Headnote:The appellant sought permission to withdraw the criminal appeal, allowing them to approach the Special Court for relief. The court agreed and dismissed the appeal as withdrawn while reserving the liberty to approach the Special Court, ensuring the appellant's right to seek resolution in a pertinent jurisdiction.

JUDGMENT

The learned counsel for the appellant seeks permission to withdraw this appeal with liberty to approach the Special Court.

Reserving the aforesaid liberty, this criminal appeal is dismissed as withdrawn.

Sd/-

Click Here to Read the rest of this document

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

2025 Supreme(Online)(Ker) 55693

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAMBECHU KURIAN THOMAS, JAMAL – AppellantVersusSTATE OF KERALA – RespondentCRL.A NO. 2187 OF 2025

Withdrawal of appeal allowed with liberty to approach Special Court.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
BECHU KURIAN THOMAS, J
AMAL – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF KERALA – Respondent
CRL.A NO. 2187 OF 2025