Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
C.S.DIAS, J
AKHIL KINGSILY, AJITH T, RAHUL K.R – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF KERALA – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. accused invoked inherent jurisdiction for quashing based on an amicable settlement. (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. parties agreed to settle, with no objections from the state. (Para 3 , 4 , 5) |
| 3. court noted conditions under which proceedings can be quashed. (Para 6 , 7) |
ORDER
The petitioners are accused Nos. 1 to 3 in C.C.No.
375/2025 on the file of the Court of the Judicial First Class Magistrate-I, Ettumanoor (‘Trial Court’, for short), which has originated from Crime No. 163/2025 registered by the Ettumanoor Police Station, Kottayam District, alleging the commission of the offences punishable under Sections 115 (2) and 296(b) read with Section 3 (5) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita , 2023.
2. The petitioners have invoked the inherent jurisdiction of this Court under Section 528 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita , 2023, to quash all further proceedings in the above case. It is asserted that the dispute that led to the registration of the crime has been amicably settled between the petitioners and the second respondent, who has executed Annexure A2 affidavit, affirming the settlement.
3. I have heard the learned counsel appearing for the petitioners, the learned Public Pr
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
