SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(Ker) 55710

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
C.S.DIAS, J
RAJENDRALAL – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF KERALA – Respondent


Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: SRI.AKHIL SUSEENDRAN
For the Respondents: SR.PP.SMT.SEETHA S

O R D E R

The Criminal Miscellaneous Case is filed to quash Annexure A1 final report and all further proceedings in Crime No.132 of 2024 registered by the Chirayinkeezhu Excise Range Office, Thiruvananthapuram, alleging the commission of the offence punishable under Section 55 (i)

of the Abkari Act , 1077.

2. When the Crl.M.C. was taken up for consideration today, the learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner would be satisfied if this Court directs the Court of the Judicial Magistrate of First Class, Varkala (Trial Court), to consider the petitioner's application for bail on the very same day he surrenders before the said court.

3. I have heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Public Prosecutor.

On a consideration of the facts, the materials on record and the limited relief now sought for, without expressing anything on the merits of the Crl.M.C., I dispose of this Crl.M.C., by permitting the petitioner to surrender before the Trial Court within two weeks from today and file applications to recall the warrant issued against him and to enlarge him on bail, after serving advance copies on the learned Public Prosecutor. If such applications a

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top