Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
K. NATARAJAN, J
JACOB – Appellant
Versus
MARY – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. the petition aims to contest a mandatory injunction affecting property access. (Para 1 , 3) |
| 2. petitioners argue legal grounds against the enforcement of injunctions without evidential merit. (Para 2 , 4 , 5) |
| 3. supporting arguments presented by the respondents emphasize the plaintiffs' right to access. (Para 6) |
| 4. court deliberates on the mandate that previous orders lacked due consideration of case merits. (Para 7 , 8) |
| 5. the petition is upheld, voiding previous rulings and calling for prompt resolution of the matter. (Para 9) |
This Original Petition is filed by the petitioners/defendants 2 and 3 for setting aside the orders passed by the Munsiff’s Court, Kodungallur in I.A. No. 2/2025 by granting mandatory injunction in O.S. No. 116/2025, and the same was upheld by the Principal Sub Court, Irinjalakuda in C.M.A. No. 9/2025.
2. Heard the arguments of the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned counsel for the respondents.
3. The case of the petitioner is that the respondent/plaintiff filed a suit against the petitioners/defendants for granting prohibitory injunction, fixation of boundary and injunction to remove the obstruction allegedly made by the petition
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
