Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation

2025 Supreme(Online)(Ker) 56096

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
N.NAGARESH, J
DR.A.T. FRANCIS – Appellant
Versus
THE EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE VELLANIKKARA – Respondent
WP(C) NO. 34804 OF 2017

Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: SRI.P.V.JAYACHANDRAN, SMT.G.N.DEEPA, SRI.NIDHI BALACHANDRAN
For the Respondents: SRI.M.V.ANANDAN

A writ petition may be dismissed as infructuous if subsequent events render it without merit.

Headnote:The present writ petition under WP

(C) NO. 34804 OF 2017, addressed to the High Court of Kerala, concerns two petitioners, both assistant librarians at educational institutions. The petition was deemed infructuous due to subsequent events. The court, acknowledging this, declared the writ petition dismissed as infructuous. The core issue was whether the writ petition retained its viability in light of these events.

JUDGMENT

Dated this the 8^th day of December, 2025 Counsel for the petitioners submits that due to subsequent events, the writ petition has become infructuous.

Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed as infructuous.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

2025 Supreme(Online)(Ker) 56096

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAMN.NAGARESH, JDR.A.T. FRANCIS – AppellantVersusTHE EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE VELLANIKKARA – RespondentWP(C) NO. 34804 OF 2017

A writ petition may be dismissed as infructuous if subsequent events render it without merit.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
N.NAGARESH, J
DR.A.T. FRANCIS – Appellant
Versus
THE EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE VELLANIKKARA – Respondent
WP(C) NO. 34804 OF 2017