Back
Next 
2025 Supreme(Online)(Ker) 56104
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
P.V.KUNHIKRISHNAN, J
VARGHESE SEBASTIAN – Appellant
Versus
LIJO – Respondent
CON.CASE(C) NO. 2957 OF 2025 | WP(C) NO.18064 OF 2023
Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: SHRI.AJITH GEORGE, SMT.P.T.THAJMINA, SHRI.NITIN SUSEELAN
For the Respondents: VIDYA KURIAKOSE
For the Appellants/Petitioners: SHRI.AJITH GEORGE, SMT.P.T.THAJMINA, SHRI.NITIN SUSEELAN
For the Respondents: VIDYA KURIAKOSE
The court allows a petitioner to file a fresh writ petition as an alternative to a contempt case, thus closing the contempt case.
Headnote:The Court considered the contempt case and determined that the petitioner has the option to file a writ petition instead of proceeding with contempt. The judgment facilitates this by granting liberty to the petitioner for a fresh writ petition. The contempt case was therefore closed.
Result: 'the Contempt Case is closed.'
JUDGMENT
After going through the Contempt Case, I think the petitioner can file a writ petition instead of filing the Contempt Case. Therefore, granting liberty to the petitioner to file a fresh writ petition, the Contempt Case is closed.
