Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation

2025 Supreme(Online)(Ker) 56133

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
S.MANU, J
AKSHAY D B. – Appellant
Versus
KOTAK MAHINDRA PRIME LTD. – Respondent
ARB.A NO. 29 OF 2025 | MA(ARB.) NO.319 OF 2025

Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: SHRI.BHARATH MOHAN, SMT.TELLMY JOLLY
For the Respondents: SRI.B.S.SURESH KUMAR, SRI.ASHLEY JOHN, SMT.RANJANA V., SMT.ANUSREE C.S., SHRI.JAISON MATHEW

The court permits withdrawal of arbitration appeal, dismissing it as withdrawn, reflecting the procedural compliance under applicable arbitration laws.

Headnote:This arbitration appeal was presented to the court seeking withdrawal. The petitioner's counsel requested permission to withdraw, leading the court to conclude that the appeal is dismissed as withdrawn. The relevant procedural aspects were addressed as necessary under the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

JUDGMENT

The learned counsel for the petitioner sought permission to withdraw the arbitration appeal.

Hence, the arbitration appeal is dismissed as withdrawn.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

2025 Supreme(Online)(Ker) 56133

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAMS.MANU, JAKSHAY D B. – AppellantVersusKOTAK MAHINDRA PRIME LTD. – RespondentARB.A NO. 29 OF 2025 | MA(ARB.) NO.319 OF 2025

The court permits withdrawal of arbitration appeal, dismissing it as withdrawn, reflecting the procedural compliance under applicable arbitration laws.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
S.MANU, J
AKSHAY D B. – Appellant
Versus
KOTAK MAHINDRA PRIME LTD. – Respondent
ARB.A NO. 29 OF 2025 | MA(ARB.) NO.319 OF 2025