Back
Next 
2025 Supreme(Online)(Ker) 56133
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
S.MANU, J
AKSHAY D B. – Appellant
Versus
KOTAK MAHINDRA PRIME LTD. – Respondent
ARB.A NO. 29 OF 2025 | MA(ARB.) NO.319 OF 2025
Important Points
The court permits withdrawal of arbitration appeal, dismissing it as withdrawn, reflecting the procedural compliance under applicable arbitration laws.
Subject
Arbitration - Appeals
Headnote
This arbitration appeal was presented to the court seeking withdrawal. The petitioner's counsel requested permission to withdraw, leading the court to conclude that the appeal is dismissed as withdrawn. The relevant procedural aspects were addressed as necessary under the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.
Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: SHRI.BHARATH MOHAN, SMT.TELLMY JOLLY
For the Respondents: SRI.B.S.SURESH KUMAR, SRI.ASHLEY JOHN, SMT.RANJANA V., SMT.ANUSREE C.S., SHRI.JAISON MATHEW
For the Appellants/Petitioners: SHRI.BHARATH MOHAN, SMT.TELLMY JOLLY
For the Respondents: SRI.B.S.SURESH KUMAR, SRI.ASHLEY JOHN, SMT.RANJANA V., SMT.ANUSREE C.S., SHRI.JAISON MATHEW
JUDGMENT
The learned counsel for the petitioner sought permission to withdraw the arbitration appeal.
Hence, the arbitration appeal is dismissed as withdrawn.
