Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
V.G.ARUN, J
ADV. G. MURALEEDHARAN PILLAI, DR. SHIJU KHAN J. S., DR. P. M. RADHAMANY, DR. S. JAYAN, R. RAJESH, DR. GOPCHANDRAN K. G., DR. M. LENIN LAL, PROF. DR. MANOJ V., DR. S. NAZEEB, PROF. DR. PRAKASH K. C., DR. RAHIM. K., DR. PRAMOD N., DR. MANOJ T. R., ADV. R. B. RAJEEV KUMAR, AJAY D.N. – Appellant
Versus
UNIVERSITY OF KERALA – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. petitioners seek a meeting regarding the suspension of the registrar. (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. discussion on the allegations against the vice chancellor regarding the meeting's agenda. (Para 3 , 4 , 5) |
| 3. court observes the syndicate had authority and maintains decorum respecting statutory boundaries. (Para 7 , 8) |
JUDGMENT
The petitioners, members of the Syndicate of the University of Kerala, have filed this writ petition seeking the following reliefs;
“(i) to issue a writ of mandamus or any other appropriate writ, order or direction directing the 2nd respondent to forthwith convene the meeting of the Syndicate in compliance with the direction issued by this Hon'ble Court in Ext.P11 judgment; (ii) to issue a writ of mandamus or any other appropriate writ, order or direction directing the 2nd respondent to convene the meeting of the Syndicate forthwith in accordance with the provisions contained in Chapter 6, Statue 1 of the Kerala University First Statutes;
(iii) to declare that the action of the 2nd respondent in not convening the meeting of the Syndicate amounts to blatant abdication of its statutory duties and is therefore absolutely arbitrary, unfair, unreasonable, illegal
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
