Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
ANIL K.NARENDRAN, MURALEE KRISHNA S., JJ
STATE OF KERALA – Appellant
Versus
K.J.RAJAN – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. challenge against pension revision under administrative tribunals act. (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. rulings and reliance on prior judgments regarding pension applicability. (Para 4 , 5 , 6 , 7) |
| 3. explanation of supervisory powers under article 227. (Para 8 , 9 , 10 , 11) |
| 4. non-interference in tribunal's decision unless manifest error is present. (Para 13 , 15) |
| 5. conclusion of dismissal of the original petition. (Para 16) |
JUDGMENT
Muralee Krishna, J.
The respondents in O.A.No.973 of 2022 on the file of the Kerala Administrative Tribunal, Thiruvananthapuram, (the ‘Tribunal’ in short) filed this original petition, invoking the supervisory jurisdiction of this Court under Article 227 of the Constitution of India , challenging Ext.P4 order dated 30.01.2025 passed by the Tribunal in that original application.
2. The respondents-applicants in the original application, who are retired Associate Professors and Principal from different Government Law Colleges, filed the original application invoking jurisdiction of the Tribunal under Section 19 of the Administrative Tribunals Act , 1985, challenging Clause 6.1 of Annexure A4 Government notification dated 25.02.2021, according to which
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
